![]() ![]() There was a difference, with a slight nod to the lake, but what specifically the difference was, wasn't obvious. ![]() Just for kicks, I placed my Lakes in front of the Vertec for a show (V5 in the amps, so the 4800 and Lake were just in system drive roles). Also, the software doesn't have some of today's feature sets with Smaart integration, and EQ grouping. It's a good sounding processor, but the lack of mesa filters, direct FIR coefficient entry, and network (Dante) I/O really make it feel really dated. I have used 4800 on over 100 plus shows with a Vertec rig the sound co I freelance tech for has. I think that was a pretty good crossover in its day. I have a BSS FDS-310 analog crossover sitting here that has basically been retired and replaced with DSPs. I also have the Zx3 FIR setting for the Dx46 and hope to play with that real soon. But we usually only use the QRX stuff for an outdoor summer concert series and that just ended yesterday with the last show for the season. But I am anxious to get some time retuning the system with the Dx46. I keep running out of time trying to play with this just before the band shows up. I have been playing around with the EV Dx46 that has the FIR setting for a bunch of the EV speaker Bi-Amped including the QRX and from some testing I have done I think this takes them to a different level. We have been using the QRX212 speakers in the passive mode not bi-amping them. Quote from: Kevin Maxwell on September 15, 2018, 12:55:25 AM What are you using the 4800 on, is it the EV QRX speakers? I have been using the DBX Drive Rack 4800 for a while now (is this the 4800 you are referring to) and I really like it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |